USA vs Belgium Stats, Match Statistics, xG & Player Data

(Seattle)

USA vs Belgium stats frame a World Cup 2026 Round of 16 match at Seattle Stadium, where the United States men’s national soccer team face the Belgium national football team on 6 July 2026. The United States bring home-field pressure, a strong scoring average, and Matt Freese’s clean-sheet run into the tie. Belgium bring heavier shot volume, stronger xG, and more chance creation through Kevin De Bruyne, Leandro Trossard, and Youri Tielemans.
United States World Cup 2026 squad and fixtures show a co-host that beat Bosnia and Herzegovina 2-0 in the Round of 32. Belgium World Cup 2026 squad and fixtures show a Group G winner that edged Senegal 3-2 after extra time. The World Cup 2026 Round of 16 bracket sends the winner toward Spain in the quarterfinals.
The match is scheduled for 8:00 PM ET at Seattle Stadium, which is 00:00 UTC on 7 July. It belongs in the World Cup 2026 stats and records tracker because FOX public data gives Belgium the xG and shot-volume edge, while the United States lead slightly in goals per game. Full match stats should replace these pre-match averages after the official event feed closes.
USA vs Belgium Stats – Match Statistics Overview
The United States enter with 2.5 goals per game, 1.2 xG, 13.3 shots, 63% average possession, and 7.5 chances created per game in FOX’s public matchup data. Their 2-0 Round of 32 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina kept the defensive trend moving, but Balogun’s suspension changes the attacking picture. Ricardo Pepi and the wide players need to replace a leading scorer’s final-third output.
Belgium enter with 2.3 goals per game, 2.0 xG, 22.8 shots, 64% average possession, and 13.5 chances created per game. Their attack carries more repeatable pressure on paper because the xG, shots, and chance-creation numbers all lean their way. The concern sits in defensive control, since FOX lists both teams at 1.0 goals against per game.
USA vs Belgium Stats Snapshot
The snapshot uses verified public pre-match data because the official live-event feed has not opened yet. Belgium lead in xG, shots, chances created, and FIFA ranking. The United States lead in goals per game and keeper clean sheets, so this matchup splits finishing output against attacking volume.
| Stat | USA | Belgium |
|---|---|---|
| FIFA Ranking | 17 | 9 |
| Goals Per Match | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| xG Per Match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Goals Against Per Match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Shots Per Match | 13.3 | 22.8 |
| Average Possession | 63% | 64% |
| Chances Created Avg | 7.5 | 13.5 |
Attacking Stats Comparison
Belgium have the stronger attacking base before kickoff. Their 22.8 shots and 13.5 chances created per game show a team that can flood the box and sustain pressure. De Bruyne leads Belgium’s FOX player data with 1.3 xG, while Tielemans leads their goals marker with two.
The United States have the better goals-per-game number, but the Balogun absence changes the finish. FOX lists Balogun with three goals, four shots on goal, and 1.1 xG, while Christian Pulisic leads the assist marker with one. Pepi’s movement and Pulisic’s carries now have to replace the missing central scorer.
| Attack Stat | USA | Belgium |
|---|---|---|
| Goals Per Match | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| Expected Goals Avg | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Shots Per Match | 13.3 | 22.8 |
| Top Scorer | Folarin Balogun, 3 | Youri Tielemans, 2 |
| Chances Created Avg | 7.5 | 13.5 |
| Shot Conversion | 19% | 10% |
| xG Leader | Folarin Balogun, 1.1 | Kevin De Bruyne, 1.3 |
Defensive Stats Comparison
The defensive comparison starts level at team level. FOX lists both sides at 1.0 goals against per game, which points toward a match shaped by chance prevention rather than only finishing. The difference comes in goalkeeper profile and how much pressure each side allows.
Freese leads the United States with a 21 keeper-save marker and two clean sheets in FOX’s player leaders. Courtois has a 20 keeper-save marker and one clean sheet for Belgium. Freese may face the busier night because Belgium’s shot volume is much higher.
| Defensive Stat | USA | Belgium |
|---|---|---|
| Goals Against Per Match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Keeper Clean Sheets | Matt Freese, 2 | Thibaut Courtois, 1 |
| Keeper Save Marker | Matt Freese, 21% | Thibaut Courtois, 20% |
| Full Tackles Data | yet to be confirmed | yet to be confirmed |
| Full Interceptions Data | yet to be confirmed | yet to be confirmed |
| Full Clearances Data | yet to be confirmed | yet to be confirmed |
Passing and Possession Analysis
The possession comparison sits almost level. FOX lists Belgium at 64% average possession and the United States at 63%, while the card normalizes the rounded values to a 50-50 visual split. Belgium still have the stronger possession outcome because their passing sequences create more shots and more chances.
The United States need their possession to become field position without exposing transition space. Tyler Adams, Weston McKennie, and Pulisic must help the host side escape Belgium’s first pressure. Belgium can hurt the U.S. if De Bruyne receives between lines and releases Trossard early.
| Passing Stat | USA | Belgium |
|---|---|---|
| Average Possession | 63% | 64% |
| Card Possession Share | 50% | 50% |
| Chances Created Avg | 7.5 | 13.5 |
| Passes Per Match | yet to be confirmed | yet to be confirmed |
| Pass Accuracy | yet to be confirmed | yet to be confirmed |
| Crosses Avg | yet to be confirmed | yet to be confirmed |
Key Player Statistics
Balogun remains the United States’ statistical leader, even though suspension reports put his availability in doubt. He leads the U.S. in goals, shots on goal, and xG in the FOX leaders. Pulisic becomes even more important because the U.S. need a creator who can carry pressure and create from wide areas.
Belgium’s leaders are spread across midfield, wide attack, and goalkeeping. Tielemans leads the goals marker and owns one player-of-the-match marker, Trossard leads assists with two, and De Bruyne leads the xG marker at 1.3. Courtois gives Belgium the experience edge in goal, even if Freese has more clean sheets in the public leaders.
| Player | Team | Key Data |
|---|---|---|
| Folarin Balogun | USA | 3 goals, 4 shots on goal, 1.1 xG |
| Christian Pulisic | USA | 1 assist in FOX leaders |
| Matt Freese | USA | 21% keeper-save marker, 2 clean sheets |
| Youri Tielemans | Belgium | 2 goals, 1 player-of-the-match marker |
| Leandro Trossard | Belgium | 2 assists, 6.6 rating in FOX leaders |
| Kevin De Bruyne | Belgium | 1.3 xG in FOX leaders |
Expected Goals Analysis
The xG comparison gives Belgium a clear pre-match edge. FOX lists Belgium at 2.0 xG per game and the United States at 1.2 xG per game. Belgium also create more shots and more chances, so their attacking data looks more repeatable.
The United States’ xG question is about replacement value. They have scored more often than Belgium per game, but Balogun owns the top finishing profile. The full-time update should separate open-play xG, set-piece xG, blocked attempts, goalkeeper saves, and shot locations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What time is USA vs Belgium?
USA vs Belgium is scheduled for 6 July 2026 at 8:00 PM ET. FIFA and FOX list the match at Seattle Stadium, with the UTC kickoff falling on 7 July.
What are the USA vs Belgium xG stats?
Before kickoff, FOX lists the United States at 1.2 xG per game and Belgium at 2.0 xG per game. Belgium have the stronger chance-quality average.
Who has the better attacking stats?
Belgium lead in xG, shots, and chances created. The United States lead slightly in goals per game, but Balogun’s suspension changes their attacking setup.
Which players lead the key stats?
Folarin Balogun leads the United States with three goals, while Youri Tielemans leads Belgium with two goals and Kevin De Bruyne leads Belgium’s xG marker.
Will the stats update after full time?
Yes. Full match stats, xG, shots, possession, player data, and event details should replace the pre-match averages after the official feed closes.
USA vs Belgium stats give Belgium the xG, shot-volume, and chance-creation edge before kickoff.
The United States need Pulisic, Pepi, McKennie, and Freese to turn home pressure into a clean knockout performance.
The full-time update should focus on whether Belgium’s volume wins, or the host side’s finishing keeps the quarterfinal path alive.

